Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Broadoak Manor Care Home

Inadequatepublished 24 April 2026, 5 months ago

Rated Inadequate: inspectors found the home performing badly and the CQC has taken enforcement action.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Broadoak Manor Care Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and communication with families during COVID-19.

Inspectors visited on 11 February 2022. This was an announced, targeted inspection during the COVID-19 response. They looked mainly at infection prevention and control, and asked about staffing pressures.

The home was clean. Inspectors found that staff used protective equipment safely, supported regular COVID-19 testing and followed current guidance. Visits, admissions and infection outbreak arrangements were also in place.

Families spoke positively about the home. Staff kept relatives informed about important changes and helped people stay in contact with their families. The home was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give a Good, Requires improvement or Inadequate rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean environment

    The home was visibly clean and cleaning tasks were recorded. Inspectors also saw staff following guidance on protective equipment.

    “The home was visibly clean and hygienic. Regular cleaning schedules were maintained by house keeping staff to evidence cleaning tasks were being completed.” from the report
  • Infection control

    Inspectors were assured that the home had arrangements for testing, protective equipment, visiting, admissions and managing outbreaks.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
  • Communication with families

    Staff regularly updated relatives about important changes, particularly during the COVID-19 period.

    “The registered manager and staff regularly communicated with family members to keep them informed of any important changes; particularly in relation to COVID-19.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are current staffing pressures affecting the care and support people receive?
  2. 02How will you keep families informed if there is an infection outbreak or another important change?
  3. 03How do you arrange visits and other contact with relatives when infection risks are present?
  4. 04How do you assess and reduce the effect of isolation on people living with dementia?
  5. 05How often do staff receive training and checks on protective equipment and infection control?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, with questions about staffing pressures; it did not provide ratings for the other four key questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2021

Broadoak Manor Care Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe care and improved leadership, with minor records and medicines-storage issues addressed during the visit.

This was an unannounced, planned inspection on 23 June 2021 and 30 June 2021. Inspectors spoke with 10 people who used the service, six family members and nine staff. They also observed care and checked care, medicines, staff and management records.

The home was rated Good overall. Safe was rated Good. Inspectors found that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm, risks were assessed, medicines were managed safely and there were enough staff to meet people's needs. Infection control arrangements were also found to be effective.

Well-led was rated Good. This improved from Required Improvement at the last inspection. Inspectors found regular checks, meetings and reviews to monitor quality and safety. They identified minor improvements needed in records and medicines storage, and the registered manager dealt with these immediately.

This inspection only rated Safe and Well-led. It does not provide new ratings for Effective, Caring or Responsive.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and families told inspectors that they felt safe and well cared for. Staff knew how to recognise and report abuse.

    “I feel safe all the time. There's always someone here.” from the report
  • Safe medicines support

    Medicines were stored and managed safely. Staff giving medicines had training and were assessed as competent.

    “People were supported to take their medicines by staff who had received training and deemed competent in the administration process.” from the report
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found there were sufficient staff to meet people's needs. People generally said staff responded to them in a timely way.

    “Sufficient staff were on duty to meet people's needs.” from the report
  • Improved management checks

    Managers carried out regular checks, daily walk-rounds and meetings to identify improvements and monitor people's care.

    “Systems in place for the monitoring of and ensuring quality and safety were effective and helped ensure that people received the care and support they needed.” from the report
  • Infection control

    Inspectors were assured about the home's arrangements for preventing and managing infection, including PPE, testing, visiting and outbreak planning.

    “We were assured the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Records and medicines storage

    minor

    Inspectors found minor areas needing improvement in records and medicines storage. The registered manager addressed these issues immediately.

    “During the inspection we identified some minor areas of improvement needed in relation to records and medicines storage.” from the report
  • Some people were not asked for their views

    minor

    Some people said they were not asked how they were or for their opinions. The home was arranging meetings and preparing a survey.

    “Some people told us that they were not asked how they were and for their opinions.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes were made to the records and medicines storage after the minor issues found during the inspection?
  2. 02How do you now check that care, support and medicines records remain accurate and up to date?
  3. 03How will residents and families be asked for their views, especially people who do not attend resident meetings?
  4. 04How will you keep families updated about changes in a person's care?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection prevention and control; the other key questions were not rated in this report. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 August 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Broadoak Manor Care Home

4 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Broadoak Manor Care Home →

  2. August 2021Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Broadoak Manor Care Home →

  3. August 2019Goodstayed Good
    Well-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2017Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2017

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 January 2017.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of St. Helens

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 92 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“He developed a close affinity with Terence, spending time talking with him before he retired to bed and looking after his needs during the night.”
John P., about Rodrigo Javier B.
“It was clear that she genuinely cared and her warm approach really helped put our minds at ease.”
Sara K., about Trudi M.
See live-in carers near St. HelensProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.