Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Bradbury Wing - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities

Goodpublished 2 June 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Bradbury Wing - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and measures to manage staffing pressures.

This was a targeted inspection on 22 February 2022. Inspectors checked infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements, and whether staffing pressures linked to COVID-19 were affecting people.

The home was meeting the infection control measures inspectors checked. This included safe use of protective equipment, testing, cleaning, social distancing, admissions, visits and managing outbreaks.

The home was inspected but not rated. The report gives no overall quality rating and does not assess all five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    Inspectors were assured that the home had effective arrangements to prevent and manage infection. They found the infection prevention and control policy was up to date.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
  • Visiting and family contact

    The home had adapted its space to support visits and had helped people keep in touch with loved ones when in-person visits were not possible.

    “The registered manager had repurposed a day centre area to safely facilitate more visits earlier in the pandemic.” from the report
  • Staffing continuity

    The report says staff worked to provide consistent care and reduce reliance on agency staff. The home also had measures to manage COVID-19-related staffing pressures.

    “Staff worked hard to provide high levels of continuity of care and to minimise the use of agency staff.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What measures are currently in place if COVID-19 or other illness creates staffing pressures?
  2. 02How are visits arranged now, and what happens if infection risks affect visiting?
  3. 03How does the home make sure protective equipment is used safely and that staff and residents can access testing?
  4. 04What arrangements are in place to prevent and manage an infection outbreak?
  5. 05How much agency staff is currently being used, and how is continuity of care maintained?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated and the other care areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2017

Rated Outstanding; inspectors found highly personalised care, strong health support and excellent leadership, with one issue about medicine storage temperatures dealt with during the visit.

The CQC visited the home without warning on 5 July 2017. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and checked care plans, medicine records, staff files and other records.

The home supported 20 adults with physical disabilities and nursing needs. Inspectors found kind and respectful care, enough staff, good safety systems and care plans that reflected people's wishes. Health professionals worked closely with the home, and staff were well trained and supported.

The home was rated Outstanding overall. It was rated Good for Safe and Caring, and Outstanding for Effective, Responsive and Well-led. It had previously been rated Good in July 2014.

Inspectors found that some medicine storage temperatures were too warm. The manager took immediate action and created an insulated temperature-controlled jacket, which reduced the temperature.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised care

    Care plans included people's routines, preferences, communication methods and emotional needs. Staff knew people well and adapted support to each person.

    “We saw people consistently received person centred care.” from the report
  • Health support

    The home worked closely with health professionals and supported people to attend health checks and appointments. Inspectors found this helped promote health and wellbeing.

    “People experienced a high level of care and support that promoted their health and wellbeing.” from the report
  • Respect and dignity

    Staff were patient, respectful and discreet. They supported choice, privacy and independence during everyday care.

    “Staff promoted independence, dignity and choice at all times.” from the report
  • Activities and independence

    People were supported to take part in activities, outings, holidays and community events that mattered to them.

    “People were provided with numerous opportunities to take part in a varied range of stimulating activities of their choice inside and outside the service.” from the report
  • Strong oversight

    The home used regular checks across care, medicines, infection control, the environment and health and safety. Any identified improvements were recorded in action plans.

    “Quality assurance checks were instrumental in driving standards of care to an outstanding level.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine storage temperatures

    needs fixing

    Some medicine storage temperatures were above the expected safe range. The manager acted immediately and developed an insulated temperature-controlled jacket that reduced the temperature.

    “We noted that some temperatures were too warm.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are medicine storage temperatures checked and recorded now?
  2. 02What staffing levels are normally provided during the day, evening and night?
  3. 03How would you support my relative to communicate choices and decisions about their care?
  4. 04What activities, outings and community opportunities are currently available?
  5. 05How are families involved in care planning and in meetings about health or end-of-life care?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five CQC question areas, with observations, discussions and checks of care, medicine, staffing and management records. This explanation was written from the published report of 3 November 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Bradbury Wing - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Bradbury Wing - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities →

  2. November 2017Outstandingup from Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: OutstandingCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Bradbury Wing - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities →

  3. December 2014Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

36 live-in carers within about an hour of Newcastle upon Tyne

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,160 a week. 30 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Petty introduced herself to Mum every time she was caring for her and responded very quickly to Mum if she was distressed in the night.”
Judith W., about Petty Tutsirai C.
See live-in carers near Newcastle upon TyneProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.