Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Boscombe Lodge Nursing Home

Goodpublished 1 July 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found that people were protected from avoidable harm. Risk assessments, medicines systems, infection controls, staff recruitment checks and learning from accidents were in place.
Effective?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
Caring?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
Responsive?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found person-centred leadership, regular staff support and meetings, feedback from people and relatives, and effective quality monitoring.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2023

Boscombe Lodge Nursing Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe care, enough staff and strong management, with no evidence that the safeguarding concern had put people at risk.

This was an unannounced inspection on 6 June 2023 after a safeguarding concern. One inspector spoke with 9 people, 1 relative and 5 staff. They also checked care records, medicines records, recruitment files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found suitable risk assessments, safe medicines systems, infection controls, staff checks and enough staff to meet people's needs. They found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from the safeguarding concern.

The overall rating was Good, the same as at the previous inspection published in May 2019. This visit only assessed Safe and Well-led. The other ratings used in the overall rating were carried forward from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Risk planning

    Care plans and risk assessments gave staff clear guidance about people's needs, including specific health needs such as catheter care and diabetes support.

    “Risk assessments and care plans were person centred and provided guidance to staff on how best to support people.” from the report
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks included work histories, references and DBS checks.

    “There are enough staff, they are always coming around.” from the report
  • Medicines safety

    Medicines records contained the information staff needed. Stock checks and regular audits were completed, and issues were acted on promptly.

    “Regular audits were completed to ensure medicines were being managed safely. Any issues highlighted were acted on promptly.” from the report
  • Supportive management

    Staff said managers were available and supportive. The home used meetings, supervision and quality checks to review care and improve practice.

    “The manager and provider are always here. The manager listens to you and is very supportive.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What was the safeguarding concern that led to this inspection, and what changes have been made since then?
  2. 02How do you check that each person's risk assessments and care plans remain accurate and up to date?
  3. 03How do you make sure there are enough staff when someone is off sick or agency staff are used?
  4. 04How are medicines audits completed, and how quickly are any problems corrected?
  5. 05When was the last review of my relative's care plan, and how can our family give feedback?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led following a safeguarding concern; Effective, Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 1 July 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured that infection prevention and control arrangements were safe.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 9 February 2021. It focused on infection prevention and control during the coronavirus outbreak response.

The home was closed to visitors and new admissions at the time. Visitors were screened, new residents were isolated for 14 days, and people and staff had regular testing.

Inspectors found that staff used personal protective equipment correctly. They also found good infection control, effective zoning during a recent outbreak, regular cleaning and regular infection control audits.

The home was inspected but not rated. This means the visit did not give the home an overall CQC rating or a separate rated score for Safe.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe use of protective equipment

    Staff had infection control training and demonstrated that they knew how to use protective equipment correctly.

    “Staff demonstrated an excellent knowledge of how to use PPE correctly and good infection control practice.” from the report
  • Testing and monitoring

    People and staff had access to regular testing, with results recorded and monitored.

    “All test results were recorded on a COVID-19 tracker that was regularly monitored.” from the report
  • Outbreak management

    The home used zoning and cohorting effectively during a recent infection outbreak.

    “Staff had a good understanding of zoning and cohorting which had been used effectively during a recent infection outbreak.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    The home was clean and had schedules for regular cleaning, including high-touch areas.

    “The service was very clean. There were cleaning schedules in place for staff to follow including regular cleaning of high touch point areas.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Are visitors still screened for COVID-19 symptoms, and what safety measures are currently in place?
  2. 02How are new admissions isolated and monitored now?
  3. 03How often do people living at the home and staff receive infection testing?
  4. 04How would the home manage another infection outbreak, including zoning and cohorting?
  5. 05How often are high-touch areas cleaned and infection control audits completed?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control practices only; the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 February 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Boscombe Lodge Nursing Home

3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. July 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Boscombe Lodge Nursing Home →

  2. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Boscombe Lodge Nursing Home →

  3. May 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

52 live-in carers within about an hour of Southend-on-Sea

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,200 a week. 45 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
“She was always cheerful and looking for ways to stimulate my mother. She became her "friend" and provided best care always.”
Julie G., about Lynette V.
See live-in carers near Southend-on-SeaProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.