Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Birchmere Mews

Goodpublished 30 July 2026, 2 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2021

Birchmere Mews was rated Good in all five areas; inspectors found kind, safe care, with some improvements needed to signage, medicine records and dignity practice.

This was an unannounced inspection on 30 May 2019. Two inspectors, an assistant inspector and an Expert by Experience spoke with people, relatives, visitors and staff. They observed care and reviewed care plans, medicine records, complaints, safety checks and staff training records.

Inspectors found people were safe, their needs were assessed, and there were enough suitably checked staff. Medicines were generally given safely, food and drinks met people's needs, and staff worked with health professionals. The home was clean and infection control was good.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Staff knew people's preferences, supported activities and helped people stay connected with their community. Care plans supported personalised care, and people and relatives felt able to raise concerns.

The overall rating and each of the five areas were Good. Inspectors identified some issues that needed attention, including limited dementia-friendly signage, inaccurate medicine stock records, one incident affecting dignity and one decision where lawful authorisation could not be confirmed.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing

    Inspectors found that staff were safely recruited and that there were enough staff to meet people's needs. Call bells were answered promptly.

    “Staff were recruited safely. Staff did not start work at the service until all the required checks had been completed to prevent unsuitable staff working with vulnerable adults.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff responded warmly to people's needs, understood their anxieties and respected their choices, privacy and dignity.

    “Throughout our visit staff offered kind and compassionate care.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Staff knew people's routines, preferences and interests. Care plans helped staff provide support suited to each person.

    “People received personalised care from staff who knew them well.” from the report
  • Activities and community links

    People could take part in activities they enjoyed, practise their faith and maintain links with family, friends and the local community.

    “People had access to a variety of social activities they enjoyed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine stock records

    needs fixing

    People generally received medicines as prescribed, but medicine stock levels were not always recorded accurately. The manager said this would be addressed immediately.

    “However, we found stock levels had not always been accurately recorded.” from the report
  • Finding the way around

    needs fixing

    Signage and visual prompts were limited, particularly for people living with dementia. The manager said they would look at improvements.

    “People sometimes found it difficult to find their way around the home independently due to the lack of signage and visual prompts.” from the report
  • One dignity incident

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found one incident where a staff member removed bed sheets without asking permission. The manager was told so action could be taken.

    “There was one incident that compromised a person's dignity when a staff member pulled the sheets off a person in bed without asking permission to locate television controls.” from the report
  • Legal authority for one decision

    serious

    Inspectors could not confirm that one best interest decision had been made lawfully because the relative involved did not have the required legal authorisation. The manager said this would be addressed.

    “there was one decision we could not confirm had been made lawfully as a relative had made a best interest decision on behalf of their family member without having the legal authorisation (lasting power of attorney) to do so.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to signage and visual prompts to help people living with dementia find their way around?
  2. 02How are medicine stock levels now checked and recorded, and how are any errors followed up?
  3. 03How do you confirm that best interest decisions have the correct legal authorisation?
  4. 04What action was taken after the incident involving a person's privacy and dignity?
  5. 05What progress has been made with community activities and transport since the planned minibus was mentioned?

This was an unannounced planned inspection of the whole care home and all five CQC areas, and it was the first inspection under the newly registered provider. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 August 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Birchmere Mews

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. August 2021Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Birchmere Mews →

  2. September 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 6 September 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Solihull

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near SolihullProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.