Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Birchams Grange

Goodpublished 20 June 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found that risks to people, equipment and the premises were assessed and reviewed, and staffing levels were sufficient. Medicines were generally managed safely, but records of topical medicines were not always accurate and complete.
Effective?
Good
People's needs were assessed before they moved in and reviewed afterwards. Staff had induction, training and supervision, and people received support with food, drink, healthcare and decisions about their care.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect. People were supported to make everyday choices and to express their views.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were personalised and regularly updated. People were supported with activities, communication, complaints and discussions about future and end-of-life care.
Well-led?
Good
The management team used regular audits and gathered feedback from people, relatives and staff. Inspectors found an open culture and staff who felt supported.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2019

Birchams Grange was rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe and well-organised care, but topical medicines records needed improvement.

This was an unannounced planned inspection on 15 May 2019. One inspector and an Expert by Experience spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and health and social care professionals. They also reviewed care files, medicines records, recruitment records, incident records and quality checks.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, assessed care risks, suitable training, clean surroundings and support with food, drink and healthcare. People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect, and their care plans reflected their individual needs.

Inspectors found that records for applying topical medicines were not always accurate and complete. The management team said this would be addressed as a priority. The overall rating remained Good, the same as at the previous comprehensive inspection in 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors saw enough staff on duty to respond to people's needs without unreasonable delays. Staff said the staffing levels and skills mix enabled them to provide safe care.

    “We saw there were enough staff on duty to respond to people's needs and requests without unreasonable delays.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    People were treated patiently and respectfully. Staff knew people well and supported their privacy, dignity and choices.

    “Staff knew the people they supported well, prioritised their needs and requests and provided their care and support in a patient, friendly manner.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's histories, preferences and key care needs. They were reviewed and updated so staff could provide individual support.

    “People's care plans were individual to them, provided guidance on key aspects of their care needs, and were reviewed and updated on a regular basis to ensure they remained effective.” from the report
  • Positive management

    The home used audits, meetings and feedback to monitor care and involve people, relatives and staff. Staff said the management team was approachable and supportive.

    “The provider had quality assurance systems and processes in place to enable them to monitor and improve the quality and safety of people's care.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Topical medicines records

    needs fixing

    Records showing when people's topical medicines had been applied were not always accurate and complete. The management team said this would be dealt with as a priority.

    “Staff did not maintain accurate and complete records regarding the application of people's topical medicines.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to recording the application of topical medicines since the inspection?
  2. 02How are topical medicines records checked for accuracy and completeness now?
  3. 03How do you assess staffing levels when people's needs change?
  4. 04How often are care plans and risk assessments reviewed and updated?
  5. 05How are people and relatives involved in reviewing care and raising concerns?

This was an unannounced planned inspection covering all five rating areas, including the premises and care provided; the overall rating and all five area ratings were assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 June 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Birchams Grange

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. June 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Birchams Grange →

  2. July 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

11 live-in carers within about an hour of Herefordshire, County of

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £960 to £1,410 a week. 10 can care for a couple. 8 years' experience on average.

“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near Herefordshire, County ofProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.