Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Beech House Care Home

Outstandingpublished 8 January 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People felt safe and risks, medicines, infection control and staffing were well managed. Inspectors noted that identity check information, including photographic checks, needed to be retained in recruitment records.
Effective?
Good
People received suitable support with nutrition, hydration, pressure ulcer prevention, mobility and healthcare. Staff had relevant training and the home followed the principles of consent and least restrictive care.
Caring?
Good
Staff were kind and considerate. Inspectors saw warm relationships, respect for privacy and dignity, support for independence, and involvement of people and relatives in care planning.
Responsive?
Outstanding
Activities were tailored to people's histories, interests and abilities, including the needs of people living with dementia. The home supported community links, family involvement, accessible information, complaints and end of life care.
Well-led?
Outstanding
The home had an open and inclusive management style. Quality checks focused on people's experiences, and people, relatives and staff were involved in improvements.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2019

Beech House Care Home was rated Outstanding overall, with safe, effective and caring support rated Good.

This was a comprehensive inspection on 23 and 25 October 2018. The first day was unannounced. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional. They observed care and checked care plans, risk assessments, medicines, training and management records.

Inspectors found people were safe, treated with kindness and supported by enough trained staff. Medicines were managed well. The home was clean. People's health, nutrition, communication needs and personal choices were assessed and reviewed.

The home was rated Outstanding for responsive care and leadership. Activities were highly personalised, links with the local community were encouraged, and people and relatives helped shape the service. The home had previously been rated Good in February 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised activities

    Activities were linked to people's life histories, interests and abilities. Inspectors saw that activities helped people feel less lonely, calmer and more engaged.

    “Activities were carefully planned to be relevant to people, were meaningful to people and matched to people's levels of ability” from the report
  • Community and family links

    People were supported to keep relationships with relatives and to take part in local activities. The home also welcomed volunteers and visits from local groups.

    “Links between people and the local community were valued and actively promoted and supported” from the report
  • Strong leadership

    Managers used direct observations, feedback, audits and incident reviews to check care and make changes. Staff were described as motivated and involved.

    “The provider had created and inclusive and empowering culture.” from the report
  • Safe and well-managed care

    Inspectors found good arrangements for medicines, staffing, infection control, emergency risks and learning from incidents.

    “Medicines were administered as prescribed and well managed. Medicines were stored and disposed of safely.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful support

    Staff respected people's privacy and dignity and promoted independence. People and relatives described staff as caring and considerate.

    “People and relatives told us the staff were caring and considerate.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Recruitment records

    minor

    Inspectors discussed the need to keep information confirming staff identity checks, including photographic checks. The manager said this would be put in place.

    “We discussed the requirement to retain information on identify checks, including photographic identity checks and the registered manager told us this would be put in place.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you check and record staff identity documents, including photographic identity checks?
  2. 02How would you tailor activities and daily routines to my relative's interests, history and abilities?
  3. 03How do you monitor my relative's food and fluid intake, weight and risk of pressure ulcers?
  4. 04How are relatives involved in care reviews, complaints and decisions about changes to care?
  5. 05How would you support my relative's healthcare needs and wishes at the end of life?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, and it also included a detailed review of oral health support as part of a national review. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 January 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Beech House Care Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.

  1. January 2019Outstandingcurrent ratingup from Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Beech House Care Home →

  2. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 2 March 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

75 live-in carers within about an hour of Nottinghamshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 63 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Ernest is an amazing professional carer who delivers care from the heart.”
Melanie B., about Ernest C.
See live-in carers near NottinghamshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.