Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Beaman House

Goodpublished 10 June 2025, 15 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2018

Beaman House was rated Good overall, with kind and safe care but several records, risk checks and management tasks still needing attention.

This was an announced, comprehensive inspection by one inspector. The report says the inspection took place on 11 October 2018 in its summary, and on 12 October 2018 in the detailed inspection section. The inspector spoke with all four residents, two relatives, three care staff, the manager and the provider's organisational manager. They also reviewed care plans, daily records, medicine records and quality checks.

All five areas were rated Good: safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. Inspectors found enough suitably skilled staff, safe medicines practice, support with health needs, kind staff and activities based on people's choices. Relatives said staff were caring and kept them involved.

The report also records issues that were being addressed. These included missing risk assessments for steep stairs, some care plans and mental capacity records still being updated, some staff training needing renewal, and the manager's registration application not having been completed successfully. No regulation was stated as breached.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough trained staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks were completed, and staff received induction, supervision and training.

    “There were enough staff on shift with the appropriate levels of skill, experience and support to meet people's needs and provide effective care.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    People were comfortable with staff, who respected privacy and dignity. Staff supported everyday choices, independence and contact with relatives.

    “Staff supported people with kindness and in a caring way.” from the report
  • Activities and choices

    People took part in activities they preferred, including day centre activities, trips and household tasks. Staff supported people to choose how they spent their time.

    “People were able to take part in individual leisure activities according to their preferences.” from the report
  • Safe medicines practice

    The medicine records inspected were complete, and staff had training and competency checks. Staff also used protocols for medicines prescribed when needed.

    “We looked at two people's medicine administration records (MAR) and found these had been completed as required by staff.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staircase risk assessment

    needs fixing

    The steep, curved staircase had not been risk assessed for three people who used upstairs bedrooms. The manager agreed to update mobility assessments.

    “The use of the staircase had not been risk assessed by the manager for the three people who had first or second floor bedrooms in the home.” from the report
  • Care records still being completed

    needs fixing

    One care plan was less detailed and on an older format. Mental capacity assessment care plans and other updates were described as work in progress, with completion expected by the end of November 2018.

    “The manager told us that mental capacity assessment care plans relating to people's general care and support at Beaman House were 'work in progress,' and would be completed by the end of November 2018.” from the report
  • Training renewals

    needs fixing

    Some staff training had expired during 2018 and other refresher training was due soon. The manager said further sessions had been planned.

    “Some staff training had expired during 2018 and others were very close to dates identified as when refresher sessions were due.” from the report
  • Management registration

    needs fixing

    The manager had been running the home without being registered with CQC for this service because an earlier application had been rejected as incomplete. A new application was submitted during the inspection.

    “The present manager thought they were registered with us to manage Beaman House.” from the report
  • Unfinished building repairs

    needs fixing

    Some pipework was not fully boxed in, and a shower-room grab handle was badly corroded. Immediate steps were taken over the lounge, and replacement work was planned.

    “However, some of the pipework had been left covered in the meantime, which posed potential risks of harm.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have all the stair-use and mobility risk assessments now been completed for people using the first and second floors?
  2. 02Were the care plans and mental capacity assessments due by the end of November 2018 completed, and how are they reviewed now?
  3. 03Have all staff refresher training sessions been completed, including first aid and health and safety training?
  4. 04Is the manager now registered with CQC to manage this home?
  5. 05Have the unfinished pipework and corroded shower-room grab handle been repaired?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, with all ratings assessed as Good and maintained from the February 2016 inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 25 October 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Beaman House

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. October 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Beaman House →

  2. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 February 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warwickshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near WarwickshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.