Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Barham Care Home

Goodpublished 10 June 2021, 5 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found up-to-date risk assessments, enough staff, safe recruitment and suitable medicines systems. They were also assured about infection prevention and control arrangements.
Effective?
Good
People's needs were assessed and care was planned with their involvement. Staff had suitable training and support, and people had access to healthcare and a varied diet.
Caring?
Good
Staff had kind relationships with people and respected their dignity, privacy, preferences and independence. People were encouraged to make day-to-day choices.
Responsive?
Good
Care records were detailed and person-centred. People had activities, choices about how they spent their time and information in formats to support communication.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found a welcoming atmosphere and positive views about the management. Quality checks were described as robust, with action taken when shortfalls were found.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2021

Barham Care Home was rated Good in all five areas; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with effective leadership and communication.

This was the first ratings inspection after the service was newly registered following a sale to a new provider in September 2019. Inspectors visited on 5 May and 17 May 2021. They spoke with people living there, relatives and staff, and checked care records, medicines, recruitment, training, complaints and quality checks.

Inspectors found that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Staffing, recruitment, medicines and infection control were satisfactory. Staff had the training and support needed to care for people.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Their care was personalised, and they were supported to make choices about daily life, meals and activities. Inspectors also found good communication with relatives and other professionals.

The overall rating and all five question ratings were Good. This means inspectors found consistently good care and management at the time of this inspection, although it does not mean every part of the service was perfect.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe care and staffing

    Inspectors found that staff understood people's risks, recruitment checks were completed and there were enough staff to meet people's needs.

    “There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People were supported by staff who knew their preferences and treated them with dignity. Staff encouraged people to make their own choices.

    “Staff had developed caring relationships with people using the service.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care records described how each person wanted to be supported. Staff understood people's needs, communication styles and preferences.

    “People's care records were detailed and person-centred. Information in them described how people wished to be supported in all aspects of daily living and their personal preferences.” from the report
  • Food and nutrition

    People had a wide choice of well-presented food. Care plans and checks were used to support people's nutritional needs.

    “The dining experience was a pleasant and well organised occasion. People had a wide choice of food available and meals served were well presented.” from the report
  • Quality monitoring

    The management team regularly checked care plans, medicines, health and safety and the environment. Inspectors said action was taken when shortfalls were identified.

    “Systems to monitor the quality of service, including reviewing care plans, checking medicines management, health and safety and the environment, were robust.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you make sure there are enough staff on each shift, including during difficult days?
  2. 02How will you involve my relative and our family in reviewing their care plan?
  3. 03What activities are available for someone with my relative's interests, mobility and communication needs?
  4. 04How will you keep relatives updated about changes in care or health?
  5. 05How do you check that medicines are given safely and on time?

This was the first ratings inspection of the newly registered care home and covered all five CQC questions, including infection prevention and control arrangements. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 June 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Barham Care Home

4 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. June 2021Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Barham Care Home →

  2. September 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  3. September 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  4. September 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  5. September 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 9 September 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

23 live-in carers within about an hour of Suffolk

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 17 can care for a couple. 7 years' experience on average.

“Not only was she professional, polite and efficient but she bought a lovely smile and laughter to my parents home.”
Liz L., about Sithembiso N.
See live-in carers near SuffolkProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.