Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at 2a Higham Road

Goodpublished 11 January 2018, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Staff understood how to recognise and report abuse. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment checks, safely managed medicines and suitable risk and emergency plans.
Effective?
Good
Care plans gave staff detailed guidance about people's needs. People were supported with nutrition, healthcare, staff training and decisions made under the Mental Capacity Act.
Caring?
Good
Staff were respectful and used people's preferred communication methods where possible. Privacy, dignity, independence and confidentiality were maintained.
Responsive?
Good
Support was personalised and plans were reviewed when people's needs changed. People were supported with activities, holidays, shopping and contact with family and friends.
Well-led?
Good
The registered manager used audits, action plans, meetings and feedback to monitor the home. Records had improved since the previous inspection and were found to be consistent and robust.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2018

Avenues South East - 2a Higham Road is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care.

This was an unannounced, comprehensive inspection on 14 November 2017. One inspector observed care, spoke with one person, two support workers and the registered manager, and reviewed care records, staff files, audits and other documents.

The home supports three people with learning disabilities, autism and communication difficulties. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines practice, suitable risk plans and clean surroundings. People were supported with food, healthcare, activities and relationships.

Staff treated people with dignity and respect. Care plans were personal and regularly reviewed. The home had good leadership, listened to feedback and had improved its records since the previous inspection.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines

    Inspectors found that medicines were stored and given safely. Records showed no gaps or omissions.

    “Medicines were managed safely and people received them as prescribed.” from the report
  • Respectful care

    Staff gave people time to communicate and respected their privacy, dignity and choices.

    “Staff communicated with people individually in a manner that showed respect.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's preferences, communication needs, health needs and daily routines. They were reviewed regularly.

    “Each person had an up to date, personalised support plan, which set out how their care and support needs should be met by staff.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to take part in activities, pursue interests, go on holidays and keep in touch with relatives and friends.

    “People remained active and participated in a variety of activities and events that met their social and physical needs.” from the report
  • Improved leadership and records

    The previous inspection found weaknesses in record keeping. Inspectors found that records and quality checks had improved at this inspection.

    “We found that the registered manager had implemented good quality assurance system and used these principles to critically review the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will staff communicate with my relative if they cannot easily express their needs verbally?
  2. 02How often will my relative's care plan and risk assessments be reviewed, and how will changes be shared with all staff?
  3. 03How will you check that medicines, including as-required medicines, are given and recorded correctly?
  4. 04What support will my relative receive to take part in activities and keep in touch with family and friends?
  5. 05How will you involve my relative, family members and advocates in decisions about care and best interests?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five questions and the overall quality of the home; inspectors could not speak with everyone because people's ability to communicate was limited. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 January 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 2a Higham Road

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at 2a Higham Road →

  2. December 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

91 live-in carers within about an hour of Medway

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Usha rapidly became 'one of the family' and is sorely missed.”
Claire T., about Usha V.
“Always on time and with a lovely smile for my mum. Theresa is kind and sensitive to my mum's needs.”
Anthea D., about Theresa L.
See live-in carers near MedwayProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.