Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at 41 Church Road

Goodpublished 20 May 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2017

Autism Together - 41 Church Road was rated Good, with safe, caring and personalised support found across all five areas.

Inspectors visited on 20 September 2017. The visit was announced and included speaking with people living in the home, a relative, staff and the manager. They observed care and checked medicines, records, staffing, training, maintenance and quality checks.

The home was found to be safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. Staff knew people's needs, medicines were managed safely, care plans were personalised and people were supported to make choices. People had varied activities and were involved in decisions about their daily lives.

The overall rating was Good, and all five question ratings were Good. This was unchanged from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Consistent staff team

    The home had a stable staff team. Inspectors said this helped people know who would support them.

    “We saw that the service was staffed by a consistent staff team who had all worked for the provider organisation for a long time.” from the report
  • Safe medicines

    Medicines were stored and managed safely. Controlled medicines were carefully monitored and weekly audits were carried out.

    “We looked at medicines management in the home and saw that it was good.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans described people's preferences and support needs. People helped write their plans with staff support.

    “We saw that the care and support provided was person centred and led by the person receiving the care.” from the report
  • People's choices

    People chose food, took part in shopping and cooking, and had busy and varied lives. Their views and concerns were listened to.

    “We saw that the people led busy, varied lives.” from the report
  • Good oversight

    The manager used regular audits, meetings and action plans to check the service. Inspectors found that actions identified through checks were completed.

    “We saw that these checks were carried out regularly and thoroughly and that any action that had been identified was followed through and completed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many people currently live in the home, and does the current staffing team remain as consistent as described in the report?
  2. 02How are medicines, including controlled drugs, checked and audited now?
  3. 03How are care plans reviewed with each person and their family when needs or preferences change?
  4. 04How are Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and people's ability to make decisions kept under review?
  5. 05What activities, work or volunteering opportunities are currently available to each person?

This was an announced inspection covering all five CQC questions, with an overall rating and ratings for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 October 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 41 Church Road

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. October 2017Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at 41 Church Road →

  2. September 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

40 live-in carers within about an hour of Wirral

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 37 can care for a couple. 8 years' experience on average.

“It was clear that she genuinely cared and her warm approach really helped put our minds at ease.”
Sara K., about Trudi M.
“He developed a close affinity with Terence, spending time talking with him before he retired to bed and looking after his needs during the night.”
John P., about Rodrigo Javier B.
See live-in carers near WirralProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.