Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at 1-2 Markyes Close

Goodpublished 23 January 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found that staff understood people's individual safety risks, medicines were checked and managed safely, and staffing levels were sufficient.
Effective?
Good
People's needs and choices were assessed with input from relatives and health professionals. Staff had relevant training, and people received support with food, drink and healthcare.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect. People were supported to communicate, make everyday decisions and maintain their independence.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans reflected people's histories, lifestyles and preferences. People were supported with activities, relationships, faith, communication and end-of-life wishes.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found that managers checked the quality of care, listened to feedback and supported staff to learn from incidents and improve the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2019

Aspire Living - 1-2 Markyes Close was rated Good in all five areas; inspectors found kind, safe and personalised care.

This was an unannounced inspection on 27 December 2018. One inspector observed care, spoke with eight staff, one relative and a health and social care professional, and checked care, medicine and management records.

The home was supporting nine people with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorders. Inspectors found people were safe, treated with dignity and supported to make choices. Staff understood people's needs, medicines were managed safely and there were enough staff.

People had support with food, health appointments, activities, relationships and communication. The home also listened to feedback and used it to improve care. All five areas were rated Good, as was the overall service.

The previous inspection, published on 28 July 2016, also rated the home Good. The report says the home planned to develop people's individual communication plans and provide more information in easy-read formats.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    People appeared happy and comfortable with staff. Staff respected privacy, dignity and independence and used people's preferred ways of communicating.

    “People enjoyed living at Aspire Living - 1-2 Markeys Close and were cared for by staff who were kind and recognised people's areas of independence.” from the report
  • Safety and medicines

    Staff knew people's individual risks, including choking risks. Staff were trained and checked as competent to give medicines, and medicine records and storage were regularly checked.

    “Staff had a clear understanding of people's individual safety risks, such as risks of choking.” from the report
  • Good health support

    People were supported to attend health appointments and to follow advice from health and social care professionals. Staff also supported people's nutritional needs and specialist diets.

    “People were supported to attend health appointments, for example, with their GPs, dieticians, speech and language specialists and opticians, so people would have good health outcomes.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People could take part in activities linked to their interests, spend time in the community and keep in touch with important people. Staff adapted activities as people's needs changed.

    “People had a range of interesting things to do.” from the report
  • Listening and improving

    The home sought views from relatives, staff and professionals. Inspectors found that suggestions and complaints were used to make changes to care and activities.

    “The registered manager gave us examples of positive changes introduced because of suggestions arising from feedback obtained.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What progress has been made with developing each person's individual communication plan?
  2. 02What easy-read information is now available to help people make decisions?
  3. 03How are people's choking risks and other individual safety risks reviewed as their needs change?
  4. 04How are activities and community opportunities adapted when a person's needs or interests change?
  5. 05How will relatives be involved in reviewing care plans and suggesting improvements?

This was an unannounced planned inspection covering the premises and care provided, with all five CQC questions assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 January 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 1-2 Markyes Close

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at 1-2 Markyes Close →

  2. July 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

11 live-in carers within about an hour of Herefordshire, County of

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £960 to £1,410 a week. 10 can care for a couple. 8 years' experience on average.

“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near Herefordshire, County ofProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.