CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Appletree Grange
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, April 2022
Appletree Grange was rated Good overall, but well-led Requires Improvement because visiting decisions were not always properly recorded.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 12 and 19 January 2022. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led, including infection control and COVID-19 vaccination requirements. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and reviewed records and audits.
The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found safe staffing, recruitment, risk management and medicines systems. They found no evidence that the visiting concerns had caused people harm, although the home's visiting policy did not initially match government guidance.
The home was rated Requires Improvement for Well-led. Visiting assessments and records did not always clearly explain decisions or risks. The home changed its visiting policy to match government guidance during the inspection. The overall rating stayed Good because the other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection.
Safe care
Inspectors found systems to protect people from abuse and avoidable harm. Staff understood people's needs and how to report concerns.
“People received safe care. There were systems in place to safeguard people from harm and abuse.” from the report
Medicines
Medicines were administered as prescribed. Staff had medicines training and regular checks of their competence.
“Medicines administration records showed people received their medicines as prescribed.” from the report
Staffing
Recruitment checks were completed and there were enough staff to meet people's care needs. Staff knew the people they supported.
“There were enough staff to meet people's care needs and there were systems in place to allocate and deploy staff safely.” from the report
Management oversight
The home had quality checks, investigated incidents and worked with health and care organisations to improve support.
“Management had clear oversight of the service.” from the report
Visiting policy
needs fixingThe visiting policy did not initially match government guidance. The home changed its policy during the inspection, but earlier decisions and the risks they created were not always clearly recorded.
“The home's policy on visiting was not aligned to government guidance.” from the report
COVID-19 vaccination checks
seriousThe home did not have effective measures to check that the legal vaccination requirement for care home workers and visiting professionals was being met.
“We found the service did not have effective measures in place to make sure this requirement was being met.” from the report
Records and feedback
needs fixingRecords did not always explain visiting decisions in enough detail or reflect people's preferences. Some staff were unsure how their feedback led to improvements.
“Assessment and planning documentation around visiting was not always robust or person centred and would have benefitted from more detail.” from the report
- 01How is the current visiting policy aligned with government guidance, and when was it last reviewed?
- 02How do you record the risks, preferences and decisions for each person's visits?
- 03What checks are now in place to confirm that staff and visiting professionals meet COVID-19 vaccination requirements or have an exemption?
- 04How do you show staff and relatives what action has been taken in response to their feedback?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection control and COVID-19 vaccination checks; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 April 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, April 2021
Appletree Grange was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention and control arrangements.
This was an announced, targeted inspection on 17 March 2021. It was carried out during the coronavirus pandemic to check infection prevention and control in the home.
Inspectors found enough suitable protective equipment, safe arrangements for putting it on and removing it, and staff following social distancing and protective equipment guidance. Staff understood how to support people with COVID-19 symptoms or positive tests.
All staff, including catering and housekeeping staff, had infection control training. Inspectors were assured about visiting, testing, admissions, hygiene, outbreak management and the infection control policy.
The home was inspected but not rated. This report does not give an overall judgement on the quality of care or ratings for the other four questions.
Protective equipment
The home had enough suitable protective equipment and stored it hygienically. Staff had separate areas to put on, remove and dispose of it.
“The home had sufficient supplies of appropriate PPE which was stored hygienically and kept safe and staff were provided with separate areas to put on and take off and dispose of PPE safely.” from the report
Staff knowledge
Staff understood how to support people who had tested positive for COVID-19 or had symptoms.
“Staff demonstrated a good knowledge of how to support people that had tested positive or were showing symptoms of COVID-19.” from the report
Staff training
Infection prevention and control training had been completed by all staff, including catering and housekeeping staff.
“All staff, including catering and housekeeping staff had undertaken training in infection prevention and control.” from the report
Social distancing
Staff followed social distancing and protective equipment guidance during the inspection.
“Staff were careful to maintain social distancing and wore appropriate PPE in line with current government guidance.” from the report
Quality checks
Senior staff described systems used to check that the home was providing safe care.
“The senior staff explained the quality systems they had in place to check the service was providing safe care.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01How are protective equipment supplies stored and checked now?
- 02How do you make sure all staff continue to follow infection prevention and control procedures?
- 03How do you manage admissions and testing when someone may have COVID-19?
- 04What arrangements are in place to prevent or manage an infection outbreak?
- 05What is the home's current full CQC rating, and have there been any later inspections?
This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control under the Safe question; it was inspected but not rated and did not assess the other four questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Appletree Grange
5 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- April 2022Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- November 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2016Goodstayed GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2014GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 15 February 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
48 live-in carers within about an hour of Gateshead
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £950 to £1,240 a week. 42 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.
“Petty introduced herself to Mum every time she was caring for her and responded very quickly to Mum if she was distressed in the night.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.