Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Amphion View Limited

Requires improvementpublished 20 November 2025, 10 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the home was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2022

Rated Good after improving from Requires Improvement; inspectors found safe care, better staff training and stronger management checks, with a medicines storage concern.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 20 July 2022. One inspector spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicines, recruitment, training and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe, Effective and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safer risk management, appropriate recruitment, improved training and better checks on the quality of care. People received their medicines as prescribed and had access to healthcare and suitable food and drink.

There were some issues to address. The medicines room was above the recommended storage temperature, and two storerooms needed sorting and cleaning. The manager had identified these issues and said action was being taken.

The previous rating was Requires Improvement, with three legal breaches. Inspectors found enough improvement had been made and said the home was no longer in breach of those regulations.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs promptly. People and relatives said staff were available to help.

    “Through our observations and talking to staff, people and relatives we found there were enough staff to meet people's needs in a timely way.” from the report
  • Improved training

    The home had acted on earlier concerns about staff training. Staff were more confident supporting people living with dementia.

    “At this inspection we found the provider had acted on these concerns and we found staff training had improved.” from the report
  • Better management checks

    The provider had introduced a range of audits. These identified poor practice and led to actions being taken.

    “We reviewed a series of audits completed by the management team and found they were effective at identifying poor practice.” from the report
  • Staff knew people well

    Staff understood people's needs and preferences and were described as kind and thoughtful in their interactions.

    “We observed staff interacting with people and found staff knew people well and were aware of their needs and preferences.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines room temperature

    needs fixing

    The medicines room was above the recommended temperature for storing medicines. The manager had identified this and was addressing it.

    “We found the medication room to be above the recommended temperature for storing medicines.” from the report
  • Storerooms needed cleaning

    minor

    Two storerooms needed sorting and cleaning. The manager later confirmed this had been addressed.

    “Although we identified two storerooms which required sorting and cleaning.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What is the current temperature of the medicines room, and how is it recorded and checked?
  2. 02What action was taken to sort and clean the two storerooms?
  3. 03How do you check that staff training, especially dementia training, remains up to date?
  4. 04How do your audits identify and correct poor practice now?
  5. 05How are people and relatives involved in reviewing care and giving feedback?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not assessed, and the inspection checked improvements after the previous breaches. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 August 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Amphion View Limited was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention arrangements during a targeted COVID-19 review.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 26 January 2022. Inspectors gave 48 hours' notice. They looked at infection prevention and control, and asked about staffing pressures linked to COVID-19.

Inspectors were assured that the home was using personal protective equipment safely, arranging testing, managing admissions and preventing or managing outbreaks. They also found that the infection prevention and control policy was up to date.

Visitors were screened for infection symptoms and could use handwashing or sanitising facilities. The home used a visiting pod and a booking system to support visits safely. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give a full overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor screening

    Visitors were checked for symptoms before entering and were given access to handwashing or sanitising facilities.

    “All visitors were screened for symptoms of infection before being allowed to enter the home.” from the report
  • Safer visiting

    The home had a visiting pod and a booking system. Communal areas were also used creatively to help reduce infection risks.

    “The home had a visiting 'pod' to help facilitate visits safely.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control arrangements are in place now?
  2. 02How are visitors currently screened before entering the home?
  3. 03Is the visiting pod still available, and how does the booking system work now?
  4. 04What measures are currently in place to manage COVID-19-related staffing pressures?
  5. 05How do you check that non-exempt staff and visiting professionals meet vaccination requirements?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control practices, with questions about COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated and the other areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Amphion View Limited

6 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. August 2022Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Amphion View Limited →

  2. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Amphion View Limited →

  3. December 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2017Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2017Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. March 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. October 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. September 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. May 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

92 live-in carers within about an hour of Doncaster

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“I can honestly say without Petros I don't believe he would have lived an extra 2 years”
Emily P., about Petros S.
See live-in carers near DoncasterProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.