Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Amber Lodge Nursing Home

Goodpublished 12 January 2026, 8 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Amber Lodge Nursing Home was inspected but not rated; infection controls were largely in place, but some equipment was dirty and COVID-19 isolation rules were not followed.

Inspectors carried out an unannounced, targeted inspection on 18 January 2022. They looked at infection prevention and control during a COVID-19 outbreak, and asked about staffing pressures.

They found several positive measures. Visitors were given protective equipment and asked to take tests. Staff used protective equipment correctly. People were tested before admission, and the home had testing, vaccination and outbreak arrangements in place.

There were two shortfalls. Some equipment was dirty, although communal areas were clean. People with confirmed COVID-19 had bedroom doors open and there were no signs showing that extra isolation precautions were in place. The provider agreed to address both points immediately.

The service was inspected but not rated. This was a focused check of infection control, not a full assessment of the overall quality of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Protective equipment

    Visitors were given protective equipment, and inspectors saw staff wearing it correctly. The home also had hand-washing facilities and protective equipment stations.

    “Staff were observed wearing correct personal protective equipment (PPE).” from the report
  • Testing and admissions

    People were tested before admission. People and staff had access to COVID-19 testing, and people with symptoms were tested immediately.

    “People were admitted into the service safely.” from the report
  • Keeping families in touch

    During the outbreak, staff helped people stay in contact with loved ones through phone calls and window visits.

    “During the active COVID-19 outbreak staff supported people to maintain contact with their loved ones via phone calls and window visits.” from the report
  • Vaccination checks

    The home checked vaccination status for visiting health professionals and met the requirement for non-exempt staff and visiting professionals.

    “The service was meeting the requirement to ensure non-exempt staff and visiting professionals were vaccinated against COVID-19.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Dirty equipment

    needs fixing

    Communal areas were clean, but inspectors found some dirty equipment. The provider agreed to check all equipment.

    “Whilst the communal areas of the home were clean, we found some equipment was dirty.” from the report
  • COVID-19 isolation

    needs fixing

    The home did not follow its own policy for isolating people with COVID-19. Bedroom doors were open and there were no signs showing that extra precautions were in place.

    “People with confirmed COVID-19 had their bedroom doors open and there were no signs on the entrance of their rooms regarding barrier nursing.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How did you check all equipment after inspectors found some of it was dirty, and how often are these checks now completed?
  2. 02What is your current process for isolating people with confirmed or suspected COVID-19?
  3. 03How do you make sure bedroom doors and isolation signs follow your infection prevention policy?
  4. 04How are visitors and health professionals currently tested and checked before entering the home?
  5. 05How would you help a resident keep in contact with family during an infection outbreak?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control and staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated for the overall quality of care. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Amber Lodge Nursing Home

5 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Amber Lodge Nursing Home →

  2. January 2020Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  3. December 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  4. July 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
  5. July 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  6. June 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  7. March 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 March 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

78 live-in carers within about an hour of Derby

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 62 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We particularly appreciate the companionship Dawn gives in the evenings when she plays cards and Scrabble with my mother.”
Sarah Y., about Dawn Z.
“Rachel is a quietly spoken, extremely caring person and looked after Val very well.”
Raymond W., about Rachel K.
See live-in carers near DerbyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.