Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Amarna House Care Home

Goodpublished 18 October 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, prompt responses to call bells, safe medicines management and suitable checks of equipment, fire safety and the environment.
Effective?
Good
Staff assessed and updated people's needs, had regular training and supervision, and supported people with meals, choices and access to health professionals.
Caring?
Good
People and relatives gave positive feedback. Staff generally knew people well, respected privacy and supported relationships, although one interaction did not respond to a person's questions or provide reassurance.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were detailed and person-centred. Activities were available every day, but complaints were not always recorded in line with the home's policy.
Well-led?
Good
The registered manager was in post and quality checks, staff meetings and feedback systems were in place. Managers used action plans when checks identified issues.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and person-centred care, with some complaints records not always complete.

Inspectors visited on 6 and 7 September 2018. The first visit was unannounced. They spoke with people, visitors and staff, observed care, and checked care plans, medicines, staff files, training records and quality checks.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines systems, detailed care plans, suitable training and positive relationships between staff and people.

People were supported to make choices and take part in activities. The home was clean and welcoming, and staff worked with health professionals to meet people's needs.

There were two points to note. One staff interaction did not provide a person with an answer or reassurance. Also, some complaints were dealt with but the responses and investigations were not always recorded as required.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors saw enough staff to meet people's needs. Call bells were answered promptly and staff were visible during the day.

    “Observations showed there were enough staff working in the home to meet people's needs and to support people.” from the report
  • Detailed care planning

    Care plans included people's needs, preferences, medical history and life stories. They were reviewed and updated regularly.

    “Care plans were person-centred and held detailed information on people's preferences, likes and dislikes.” from the report
  • Kind relationships

    People and relatives spoke positively about staff. Inspectors saw meaningful interactions and staff supporting people's relationships and choices.

    “We observed meaningful interactions between staff and people.” from the report
  • Safe medicines

    Inspectors found medicines were stored safely and records showed people received them as prescribed.

    “Medications were managed safely. Records confirmed people had received their medicines as prescribed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • One poor interaction

    minor

    Inspectors saw one occasion when a staff member did not answer a person's questions or offer reassurance. The manager addressed this with the staff member on the first day.

    “We observed one interaction where a member of staff did not answer direction questions from a person.” from the report
  • Complaints paperwork

    needs fixing

    The home said complaints were dealt with, but response letters and investigation records were not always kept. This did not follow the home's complaints policy.

    “Where complaints had been made, records showed they were not always responded to in line with company policy.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you make sure complaints are investigated and response letters are recorded every time?
  2. 02What action was taken after the interaction where a person's questions were not answered?
  3. 03How will you make sure staff continue to update care plans when people's needs change?
  4. 04How are people and relatives involved in planning and reviewing activities and care?
  5. 05How do your daily and monthly checks identify and act on changes in people's needs?

This was an inspection of all five areas of the service, and the overall rating remained Good from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 October 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Amarna House Care Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. October 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Amarna House Care Home →

  2. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2014

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 November 2014.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

37 live-in carers within about an hour of York

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,270 a week. 32 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“She was always 'just present enough': attentive, available, kind and engaging, but without ever over-stepping any boundary”
Beatrice N., about Rosemary H.
See live-in carers near YorkProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.