Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Althorpe Residential Home

Requires improvementpublished 28 October 2025, 11 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the home was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2019

Althorpe Residential Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and well-organised care, with one electrical certificate record missing at the time of inspection.

The inspection took place on 3 and 5 April 2019. It was unannounced on the first day and announced on the second. Inspectors spoke with people living at the home, a relative, staff and managers. They also reviewed care records, medicines records, staff files, audits, complaints and other documents.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found people were protected from abuse, received their medicines safely, and had enough staff to meet their needs. Staff were trained, kind and respectful, and supported people's health, choices, independence and activities.

Problems found at the last inspection with medicines, infection control and the home's general décor had been addressed. The previous electrical hardwiring certificate could not be found, so the electrical check was repeated just after this inspection. The report says the home continued to be monitored through the CQC's re-inspection programme.

What inspectors praised
  • Protection from harm

    Inspectors found safeguarding procedures, risk assessments and incident reviews were in place. Action was taken to reduce risks while supporting people's independence.

    “People were protected from the risk of harm and abuse.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives said staff were kind and caring. Staff listened, offered reassurance and protected people's privacy and dignity.

    “Staff communicated with people with compassion and listened to what people said.” from the report
  • Activities and personal choice

    The home offered varied activities and supported people's hobbies, interests and community links. People could choose where to eat and received information in formats suited to their needs.

    “There was an extensive and creative programme of activities provided.” from the report
  • Quality monitoring

    Managers used audits and feedback to check the service and created action plans when problems were found. Staff were supported through training, supervision and appraisals.

    “A range of checks and audits were undertaken by the management team to assess the quality of the service provided.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Missing electrical certificate

    minor

    The previous five-year electrical hardwiring certificate had been misplaced and could not be duplicated. The electrical check was repeated just after the inspection, but families may wish to confirm that the new record is available.

    “We found the record of the previous electrical hardwiring certificate had been misplaced.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Can you show us the electrical installation check that was carried out after the inspection?
  2. 02How do you support people living with dementia to choose activities, meals and daily routines?
  3. 03How are changes in a person's health or behaviour recorded and shared with relatives and health care professionals?
  4. 04How are end of life wishes recorded, and how can relatives be involved?
  5. 05How do you review staffing levels when people need appointments, activities or end of life support?

This was a planned inspection covering all five CQC questions, and both the premises and the care provided were looked at. This explanation was written from the published report of 1 May 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2016

Althorpe Nursing Home was rated Good overall; inspectors found kind, effective care, but safety required improvement because of environmental, infection control and recording shortfalls.

This was an unannounced inspection on 1, 3 and 17 August 2016. One inspector looked at care records, medicines, staffing, training, complaints, audits and the building. They spoke with people living there, a relative, staff, the manager and a health care professional.

People generally received kind and respectful care. There were enough staff during the visits, staff understood people's needs, and people were supported with food, activities, choices and contact with health care professionals. The home followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act when people needed help making important decisions.

Safety was rated Requires Improvement. Inspectors found problems with cleanliness, the laundry, commodes, some decoration and one medicines record. They also found that one person's health and dietary records needed updating. The manager took action during the inspection, including starting refurbishment and improving cleaning arrangements.

The overall Good rating means the inspectors found the service was performing well in most areas. It does not mean everything was right. The previous inspection had rated Safe and well-led as Requires Improvement because of medicines problems, and those earlier problems had been addressed.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw staff treating people with dignity and kindness. Staff took time to communicate in ways that helped people living with dementia.

    “We observed staff treated people with dignity, respect and kindness.” from the report
  • Enough trained staff

    Staffing levels met people's needs during the inspection. Staff had training in areas including safeguarding, moving and handling, first aid and medicines.

    “We saw there were enough staff provided to meet people's needs in a timely way during our visits to the service.” from the report
  • Choice and independence

    People were supported to make decisions about daily life, including what to eat, wear and do. Staff encouraged people to remain as independent as possible.

    “Staff assisted people in a gentle way to promote their independence and choice.” from the report
  • Activities and interests

    The home provided activities, outings and religious services. People were encouraged to continue with their hobbies and interests.

    “People were encouraged to maintain their hobbies and interests.” from the report
  • Action when problems were found

    The manager acted during the inspection to improve cleaning, infection control, the environment and one person's care records.

    “The management team took action to address the shortfalls found during our inspection.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Environment and infection control

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found problems including damaged flooring and paintwork, dusty rooms, a difficult-to-clean laundry and unsuitable commodes. Some problems were corrected during the inspection, while refurbishment work was planned or underway.

    “We found issues with domestic cover provided at weekends, infection control in the laundry and in relation to commodes.” from the report
  • Medicines recording

    needs fixing

    The medicines system had improved since the previous inspection, but one medicine administration record had not been signed after medicine was given. The record was corrected during the inspection.

    “A member of staff had not signed a person's medicine administration record (MAR) when their medicine had been given.” from the report
  • Monitoring nutrition and changing needs

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found that nutritional needs were not always monitored effectively. One person's records were updated after weight loss was identified, and the GP was contacted.

    “People's nutritional needs were not always monitored effectively.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What work has been completed on the laundry, commodes, damaged flooring, paintwork and bedroom cleanliness since the inspection?
  2. 02How is weekend domestic cover now provided, and who checks that bedrooms and shared areas remain clean?
  3. 03What checks now make sure every medicine administration record is signed correctly and medicines are given as prescribed?
  4. 04How are people's weight, food and drink intake, and changing dietary needs monitored and reviewed?
  5. 05How is the new manager checking that the improvements found during the inspection remain in place?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five questions and the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 October 2016 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Althorpe Residential Home

3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. May 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Althorpe Residential Home →

  2. October 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Althorpe Residential Home →

  3. February 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

32 live-in carers within about an hour of North Lincolnshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,300 a week. 29 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“What truly stands out is how mindful and attentive she is to all of my medical needs, always going above and beyond to ensure I’m comfortable and well cared for.”
Lucy K., about Emma H.
“Martin was more than a carer, he managed the home and became my uncle's best friend, enriching his life during his last few years.”
Julie V., about Martin G.
See live-in carers near North LincolnshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.