Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Acorn Village

Goodpublished 24 November 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and harm, risks were assessed and managed, and staffing levels were considered sufficient. Medicines, equipment, premises and recruitment checks were also managed appropriately.
Effective?
Good
Staff received relevant training and regular supervision. People were supported with food, healthcare and decisions under the Mental Capacity Act, and improvements had been made to the storage of DoLS information.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with dignity and respect and understood their individual communication needs. People were encouraged to make choices, maintain independence and keep in contact with family.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans described people's needs and preferences, and people had access to activities at home and in the community. The home had a complaints process and relatives said concerns were dealt with promptly.
Well-led?
Good
There was a clear management structure, staff understood their responsibilities and quality checks were carried out. Staff, relatives and inspectors described the management positively.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2018

Acorn Village was rated Good; inspectors found safe, caring and person-centred support, with some care records still being updated.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 15 and 16 October 2018. Inspectors observed care, spoke with people, relatives, staff and professionals, and reviewed care records, medicines records, staffing information and quality checks.

The inspectors found that people were safe and that there were enough suitably trained staff. Medicines were managed safely. Staff understood safeguarding, mental capacity and liberty protection duties, and people were supported to make choices and stay as independent as possible.

Care was kind and respectful. People had individual care plans, activities and support to keep in touch with family and access health services. The overall rating stayed Good, as did the ratings for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff understood safeguarding and how to manage individual risks.

    “People and their relatives told us they felt safe living in the service.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Inspectors saw positive relationships, humour and respectful care. Staff knew how people communicated and supported their choices.

    “Staff were caring towards people and treated them with dignity and respect this was evident in our observations.” from the report
  • Promoting independence

    People were supported to do things for themselves, take part in activities and make choices about food and daily life.

    “The staff encouraged people to be independent; we observed people using adapted equipment to enable them to eat independently.” from the report
  • Good management oversight

    The home had clear responsibilities, regular audits and ways for staff and people to give feedback.

    “The service carried out a range of audits to monitor the quality of the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some care records were still being updated

    minor

    Care plans were detailed, but the management team was still reviewing documents and archiving information that was no longer current.

    “All care plans were in the process of being reviewed by the management team as they were aware that some documents needed archiving to ensure they only held relevant up to date information.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure my relative's care plan contains only current information?
  2. 02Has my relative discussed and recorded their wishes about future or end of life care?
  3. 03How would you support my relative to manage medicines independently, if appropriate?
  4. 04How many staff will usually be available in the house, including for activities and community trips?
  5. 05How will my relative be involved in choosing activities, meals and decisions about their daily care?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five CQC questions and the overall rating; the report says the service had been rated Good at the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 November 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Acorn Village

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Acorn Village →

  2. October 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. March 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

35 live-in carers within about an hour of Essex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 25 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Not only was she professional, polite and efficient but she bought a lovely smile and laughter to my parents home.”
Liz L., about Sithembiso N.
“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
See live-in carers near EssexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.