CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Acorn House - Croydon
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, November 2022
Acorn House - Croydon was rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found people safe and cared for, but legal safeguards and management needed more consistent attention.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 18 October 2022. Two inspectors spoke with people, staff and a healthcare professional, observed care and checked care records, medicines, recruitment, training and management records.
The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, good infection control, safe medicines practice and systems for managing risks, safeguarding concerns and incidents.
It was rated Requires Improvement for Effective and Well-led. DoLS applications had not always been made promptly, some areas needed refurbishment, and there had been no registered manager since November 2021. The new manager had made several improvements, but inspectors could not yet be sure these were fully effective and consistent.
The overall rating changed from Good at the previous inspection, published in September 2019, to Requires Improvement. Caring and Responsive were not inspected during this visit, so their previous ratings were carried forward.
People were kept safe
Staff understood safeguarding and individual risks. Inspectors saw staff responding promptly and appropriately when people needed help.
“Staff were vigilant when people were moving around the service or undertaking activities and made sure people remained safe.” from the report
Medicines were managed safely
People received their medicines as prescribed. Records, stock checks, storage and staff competency checks were all reviewed.
“Our checks of stocks and records showed people consistently received the medicines prescribed to them.” from the report
Positive staff relationships
People gave positive feedback about staff, and inspectors saw staff supporting people in a kind and respectful way.
“The staff are very nice, kind, helpful, all of them. They like me and I like them. I am very happy here.” from the report
Recent improvement work
The new manager had appointed a deputy, introduced a new records system, improved medicines arrangements and brought staff training and supervision up to date.
“Some improvements had been made since the manager joined the service and these included; appointment of a deputy manager to strengthen management oversight at the service” from the report
Delays with legal safeguards
seriousApplications for DoLS authorisation were not always submitted promptly. Inspectors said this created a risk that people could be deprived of their liberty unlawfully, although they found no evidence of harm during this inspection.
“Although we did not find evidence at this inspection that people had been harmed due to the delay in the provider making these applications, there was a risk of people being unlawfully deprived of their liberty.” from the report
Management was not yet consistent
needs fixingThe home had no registered manager in post, and the new manager's improvements had only been in place for about three months. Inspectors could not yet be fully assured that the changes would last.
“However, as many of these improvements had only been made in the three months leading up to our inspection, we could not be fully assured that management and leadership of the service was fully effective and consistent at this time.” from the report
Some areas needed refurbishment
needs fixingSome bedrooms and other parts of the home needed redecorating or refurbishment. Work had started, but the improvements were not complete.
“However, some areas of the service, including some people's rooms, needed to be redecorated or refurbished to reflect people's needs and preferences.” from the report
Support with food choices
minorFor one person, staff repeated the food choices but did not use pictures or show the options on plates. Inspectors recommended reviewing dementia guidance on eating and drinking.
“However, we noted for one person staff had to explain the choices available to them several times but did not use pictorial menus or plate up the options available” from the report
- 01Are all current DoLS applications now submitted promptly, and how do you check that renewals and conditions are followed?
- 02Has the manager's application to become the registered manager been submitted and accepted by the CQC?
- 03Which refurbishment and redecoration works have been completed, and what remains outstanding?
- 04How do you now help people living with dementia understand and choose between food and drink options?
- 05How are the new care records, staff training and management audits checked to make sure improvements continue?
This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 November 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, September 2019
Acorn House - Croydon rated Good overall; inspectors found improved care, but leadership and management still needed improvement.
Inspectors visited on 4 and 5 September 2019 without warning. They spoke with people, a relative, staff and a healthcare professional. They also checked care records, medicine records, recruitment files, training information and management records.
The home was rated Good for safety, effectiveness, care and responsiveness. Inspectors found improvements in care planning, record keeping, staffing checks, cleanliness, activities, medicines and support with health needs. People said staff were kind, attentive and met their needs.
The home was rated Requires Improvement for being well-led. A new manager had started shortly before the inspection, but there was not yet enough evidence that leadership was effective and consistent. Staff had also not been receiving regular supervision, and some decisions after incidents did not protect people's safety quickly enough.
The overall rating improved from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection. The home was no longer in breach of regulations, but inspectors said many improvements were recent and had not yet been shown to continue over time.
Kind and respectful staff
People spoke positively about staff. Inspectors saw staff listen, use people's preferred names, ask permission and support personal choices.
“Staff were kind, addressed people by their preferred name and took time to chat with people throughout the day.” from the report
Personalised care records
Care records included people's history, preferences, likes and dislikes. Assessments were completed before people moved in and care was reviewed monthly.
“People's care records now contained more detail and information about each person, their life history, their likes and dislikes, hobbies and interests” from the report
Safer staffing and medicines
Recruitment checks had improved and inspectors found enough staff. Medicine stocks, records and storage were checked and people received their prescribed medicines.
“Our checks of stocks and balances of medicines and records showed people consistently received the medicines prescribed to them.” from the report
Improved activities and environment
The home had improved activities, cleanliness and some communal areas. Inspectors saw people taking part in group and individual activities.
“We observed a number of group based and one to one activities taking place during our inspection.” from the report
No registered manager
needs fixingThere was no registered manager in post. A new manager had started only two days before the inspection, so inspectors could not yet judge whether leadership would be effective and consistent.
“The service did not have a registered manager in post.” from the report
Staff supervision was not regular
needs fixingStaff had not been receiving one-to-one supervision at regular intervals. Action had started, but inspectors had not yet seen the new arrangements working consistently.
“We found staff had not been having supervision at regular intervals.” from the report
Some safety decisions were too slow
seriousThe provider did not always act promptly when concerns were raised about a staff member's suitability. Inspectors said some decisions after incidents did not sufficiently protect people's safety and wellbeing.
“The provider did not take prompt and appropriate action when concerns were raised about the suitability of a staff member to help protect people.” from the report
Improvements not yet proven over time
minorMany positive changes had happened only in the months before the inspection. Inspectors could not yet be sure that good practice would continue consistently.
“Many of the positive changes and improvements we found had been made in the months prior to our inspection” from the report
- 01Who is now the registered manager, and when was their registration application submitted?
- 02How often do staff now receive supervision, and how do you check that every staff member receives it?
- 03What changes have been made to ensure concerns about staff suitability are acted on promptly?
- 04How do you check that the improvements found in this inspection are being maintained over time?
- 05What activities are now available, and how are they matched to each person's interests and preferences?
This was a planned, unannounced inspection covering the premises, care provided and all five CQC questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 September 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Acorn House - Croydon
7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- November 2022Requires improvementcurrent ratingdown from GoodSafe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- September 2019Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- June 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2017Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2016Goodstayed GoodSafe: Requires improvement
- February 2015GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 15 December 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Croydon
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“She cared for my mum with Alzheimer's with endless patience and kindness, always arriving with a smile and a positive attitude”
“Terry has been of invaluable help to our family while working as a part-time live-in carer for our mother for approximately 6 months”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.