Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Ackroyd House

Goodpublished 18 February 2025, 19 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found infection control arrangements were in place during a targeted COVID-19 review.

Inspectors visited the home on 27 January 2022. The visit was announced 48 hours in advance and focused on infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They found visitors were screened for symptoms and could wash or sanitise their hands. The home used a visiting pod, a booking system and communal areas to support safer visits.

Inspectors were assured that the home was using protective equipment safely, supporting testing, managing outbreaks and following social distancing and shielding rules. The home also met vaccination requirements for non-exempt staff and visiting professionals.

This was not a full inspection and no rating was given. The overall service and Safe question were recorded as inspected but not rated.

What inspectors praised
  • Safer visiting arrangements

    The home had screening, hand hygiene facilities, a visiting pod and a booking system to support visits during the pandemic.

    “The home had a visiting 'pod' to help facilitate visits safely.” from the report
  • Infection control measures

    Inspectors were assured that the home had arrangements covering protective equipment, testing, hygiene, social distancing and outbreak management.

    “We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
  • Vaccination requirements

    The home was meeting the requirement for non-exempt staff and visiting professionals to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

    “The service was meeting the requirement to ensure non-exempt staff and visiting professionals were vaccinated against COVID-19.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Are visitors still screened for infection symptoms before entering the home?
  2. 02How are visits arranged now, and is the visiting pod or another safe visiting arrangement still available?
  3. 03How are protective equipment, testing and outbreak management handled currently?
  4. 04How does the home manage staffing pressures when staff are affected by COVID-19?
  5. 05How does the home check that visiting professionals meet current vaccination or exemption requirements?

This was a targeted, announced inspection of infection prevention and control and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it was not a full inspection and the service was not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2020

Ackroyd House was inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 29 October 2020. Inspectors checked infection prevention and control measures because the home had been identified as a designated care setting for people discharged from hospital with a positive COVID-19 status.

Inspectors were assured that visitors were managed safely, social distancing and shielding rules were followed, and people were admitted safely. They were also assured that personal protective equipment, testing, cleaning and the infection control policy were being used appropriately.

The home was described as exceptionally clean, with good supplies of hand sanitiser and cleaning products. Staff worked in consistent teams, and the provider had increased supervision and training to support them.

The service was inspected but not rated. This means the report does not give a Good, Requires Improvement or Inadequate rating, and it does not assess the full range of care provided.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean environment

    Inspectors found the home exceptionally clean and saw ample supplies of hand sanitiser and cleaning products.

    “The service was exceptionally clean, there were ample supplies of good quality hand sanitiser and cleaning products.” from the report
  • Consistent staff teams

    Staff worked in regular teams using a bubble system, which supported infection control.

    “A dedicated staff team was in place to support people. Staff worked on shifts with the same staff to ensure they were working within a bubble system.” from the report
  • Staff support

    The provider increased supervision and training, and staff said they felt supported and safe.

    “Staff said they were well supported and felt the systems and processes in place kept them safe.” from the report
  • Quick response to advice

    The provider acted on recommendations from external professionals quickly.

    “External professionals had assessed the providers IPC measures and any recommendations had been actioned within 24 hours.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are visitors currently prevented from catching or spreading infections?
  2. 02What checks are used when new residents are admitted, particularly after hospital discharge?
  3. 03How do you make sure staff use personal protective equipment safely and effectively?
  4. 04How often are residents and staff tested, and what happens when a test is positive?
  5. 05Have the staff bubble arrangements and increased supervision continued since this inspection?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures only, so the service was inspected but not rated and the other key questions were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 December 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Ackroyd House

5 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Ackroyd House →

  2. December 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Ackroyd House →

  3. November 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2018Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2018Inadequatedown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. June 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. August 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 August 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

97 live-in carers within about an hour of Rotherham

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 80 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Beatrice was a talent dementia carer whose professionalism and dedication allowed mums wishes to remain in her own her come true.”
Alison P., about Beatrice M.
See live-in carers near RotherhamProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.