Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Abbeywood Tottington Limited

Goodpublished 22 February 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found safe systems for safeguarding, risk management, falls, medicines, recruitment and infection control. People said they felt safe, although views about staffing levels were mixed.
Effective?
Good
This key question was not assessed during this focused inspection. Its rating was carried forward from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating.
Caring?
Good
This key question was not assessed during this focused inspection. Its rating was carried forward from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating.
Responsive?
Good
This key question was not assessed during this focused inspection. Its rating was carried forward from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating.
Well-led?
Good
The management team completed audits and checks, used an improvement plan and submitted required notifications. A new manager had been appointed, with an application to register with CQC still to be completed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found safe care and good management, but staffing levels and activities needed further review.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 17 and 26 January 2023. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led after concerns about care, staffing levels and falls management. They spoke with 10 people, one relative and four staff, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and safety records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Good for Well-led. Inspectors found suitable safeguarding, risk management, medicines, infection control and recruitment systems. They found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from the concerns that had been raised.

The management team carried out checks and had an improvement plan. However, people gave mixed views about staffing, activities were limited, and a new manager had been appointed but had not yet completed the application to register with CQC.

What inspectors praised
  • Safety monitoring

    Incidents and falls were monitored, and the information was used to identify learning and help keep people safe.

    “Effective monitoring systems were in place; these include incidents and falls. These helped to identify areas of learning, so people were kept safe.” from the report
  • Medicines

    Inspectors found that prescribed medicines, including controlled drugs, were stored and managed safely.

    “People's prescribed medicines were managed and administered safely.” from the report
  • Care and staff

    People generally spoke positively about the staff and the support they received. Inspectors also found that people were supported to make choices and remain as independent as possible.

    “People spoke positively about the staff and the care and support they received.” from the report
  • Management checks

    The home used audits, checks and a business improvement plan to identify areas for development.

    “Audits and checks were carried out in a range of areas. These helped to inform the home business improvement plan.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staffing levels

    needs fixing

    People gave mixed views about whether there were enough staff. The manager agreed that staffing levels needed to remain under review.

    “There never seems to be enough staff to manage all the everyday needs” from the report
  • Limited activities

    minor

    People said activities were limited and that they could become bored. The manager said this would be explored further.

    “I am happy here but there is nothing to do and it can get quite boring” from the report
  • Manager registration

    minor

    The previous registered manager had resigned. A deputy manager had taken over as manager, but the application to register with CQC was still due to be submitted.

    “An application to register with CQC was to be submitted.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many staff are planned for each shift, and what happens when the home is short-staffed?
  2. 02What activities are currently offered, and how do residents help decide what is provided?
  3. 03Has the new manager completed the application to register with CQC?
  4. 04How will families receive regular updates and information about events?
  5. 05How are falls and changes in residents' risks reviewed and followed up?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key-question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 February 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2022

Abbeywood Tottington Limited is Rated Good; inspectors found improvements in safety and management, with a medicines fridge issue still being addressed.

This was an announced focused inspection on 30 March 2022. One inspector spoke with four people and five staff, and reviewed care records, medicines records, recruitment files, and health and safety checks.

The home had improved since the previous inspection. Staff recruitment checks, risk assessments, safety checks, care records, medicines systems, and management audits had been strengthened. Staffing levels were considered adequate, although managers were recruiting more staff as occupancy increased.

Inspectors found people were supported safely and could maintain contact with family and friends. They also found that the home followed infection control guidance and worked within the Mental Capacity Act.

The overall rating changed from Requires Improvement to Good. This inspection only checked Safe and Well-led, so the other ratings were carried forward from the previous comprehensive inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Improved safety checks

    The home had strengthened risk assessments, emergency plans, premises checks, and equipment checks since the previous inspection.

    “Care files included up to date assessments with guidance for staff to follow to help mitigate areas of risk.” from the report
  • Safer recruitment

    Recruitment records and checks were in place before new staff started, including checks for agency staff.

    “Relevant information and checks were carried out prior to new staff commencing employment.” from the report
  • Safe medicines support

    Medicine administration records, topical cream records, and decisions about covert medicines had improved and were being managed safely.

    “Mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were undertaken where people refused their prescribed medicines.” from the report
  • Supportive staff

    People spoke positively about staff and said they felt happy, safe, and supported.

    “I feel happy and safe” from the report
  • Better management oversight

    Audits, updated policies, training, and ongoing reviews were being used to identify improvements.

    “A range of audits and checks were completed to help identify areas of continuous improvement.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine fridge temperature

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found the medicine fridge was too warm. The pharmacy was contacted and a replacement fridge was ordered during the inspection.

    “We found the fridge temperatures were high. During the inspection the pharmacy was contacted, and a new fridge ordered.” from the report
  • Timeliness of notifications

    minor

    The home was submitting required statutory notifications, but the manager was reminded to send them to CQC promptly.

    “However, the registered manager was reminded these must be submitted in a timely manner ensuring the Commission is kept fully informed.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has the replacement medicine fridge been installed, and how are its temperatures now checked and recorded?
  2. 02How do you make sure all statutory notifications are sent to CQC promptly?
  3. 03How many staff are currently working on each shift, and how will staffing change as occupancy increases?
  4. 04What checks now make sure care records and risk assessments stay up to date when people's needs change?
  5. 05What activities and opportunities are now available for residents and relatives?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring, and Responsive were carried forward from the previous comprehensive inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 April 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Abbeywood Tottington Limited

5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Abbeywood Tottington Limited →

  2. April 2022Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Abbeywood Tottington Limited →

  3. April 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Bury

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 94 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
“She understands the needs of an elderly person in the early stages of dementia and has treated my mother with great kindness and skill.”
Simon W., about Ncebakazi V.
See live-in carers near BuryProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.