Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Abbeydale - Derby

Goodpublished 6 March 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed, including through screening, testing, protective equipment, cleaning and vaccination checks.
Effective?
Good
This question was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This question was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not covered by the targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and visiting arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 12 January 2022. Inspectors looked mainly at infection prevention, infection control, visiting arrangements and the effect of COVID-19 staffing pressures. The home had 27 people living there and could support up to 41.

Inspectors found screening for visitors, regular COVID-19 testing, suitable use of protective equipment and infection control training. They found the home clean and tidy, with extra cleaning and updated infection control guidance.

The home was inspected but not rated. This means the report does not give a Good, Requires Improvement or Inadequate judgement for the service overall.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control training

    Staff had received infection prevention and control training and were seen using protective equipment appropriately.

    “Staff were observed wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately.” from the report
  • Testing and screening

    Visitors were screened and staff and residents were part of a regular COVID-19 testing programme.

    “There was a programme of regular COVID -19 testing for staff and people living in the service.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    Inspectors found the home clean and tidy. Cleaning arrangements had been increased, including deep cleaning between occupants.

    “The home was clean and tidy. Domestic staff levels had increased, and deep cleaning also took place in between occupants.” from the report
  • Contact with relatives

    During the outbreak, non-essential visits were stopped, but people were supported to keep in touch by telephone and video calls.

    “People were supported to continue to maintain contact with their relatives and friends through telephone calls and video calls.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection screening and COVID-19 testing arrangements are in place now?
  2. 02How are staff expected to use protective equipment, and what training have they received?
  3. 03What are the current visiting arrangements, including what happens during an infection outbreak?
  4. 04How would the home manage staffing pressures if staff were absent because of COVID-19?
  5. 05How often is the infection prevention and control policy reviewed and updated?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19 staffing pressures, not a full inspection of all five questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 July 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2022

Abbeydale - Derby was inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong COVID-19 infection-control arrangements.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 7 April 2022. Inspectors looked mainly at infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic. They also asked about staffing pressures.

Inspectors were assured that the home was using protective equipment safely, arranging testing, managing visitors and admissions, and following shielding and social distancing guidance. Cleaning took place throughout the day, and infection-control policies and audits were up to date.

People who tested positive were supported to isolate in their rooms. Where several people tested positive, they used a separate lounge area. Visits had been supported where possible, including visits from essential carers and video calls.

The service was inspected but not rated. This means the inspection did not provide a Good, Requires Improvement or Inadequate rating for the home.

What inspectors praised
  • Regular cleaning

    Cleaning took place throughout the day, rather than only at set times.

    “We saw that cleaning took place throughout the day so that there was continuous cleaning taking place.” from the report
  • Infection-control checks

    The home had audits and records to identify and follow up areas needing improvement.

    “There was a robust infection prevention and control audit in place.” from the report
  • Staff training

    Staff had training in infection prevention, food hygiene, COVID-19, hand washing and using protective equipment.

    “Staff had been trained in infection prevention and control, food hygiene and COVID-19.” from the report
  • Family contact

    The home supported visits where possible and also used video calls to help reduce isolation.

    “They had also facilitated zoom meetings with family's which had been accepted well and helped to reduce isolation.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What measures are currently in place to manage staffing pressures linked to COVID-19 or other illness?
  2. 02How would you manage an outbreak now, including isolation and the use of separate areas?
  3. 03How often are cleaning and infection-control audits carried out, and how are any problems followed up?
  4. 04How can families visit, including if a relative needs close family involvement or is an essential carer?
  5. 05How are residents and staff currently tested for COVID-19 when needed?

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, with questions about staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated and the other care areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 June 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Abbeydale - Derby

3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. July 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Abbeydale - Derby →

  2. June 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Abbeydale - Derby →

  3. March 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. April 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

78 live-in carers within about an hour of Derby

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 62 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We particularly appreciate the companionship Dawn gives in the evenings when she plays cards and Scrabble with my mother.”
Sarah Y., about Dawn Z.
“Rachel is a quietly spoken, extremely caring person and looked after Val very well.”
Raymond W., about Rachel K.
See live-in carers near DerbyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.