Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Aarandale Lodge

Goodpublished 20 July 2026, 2 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2021

Aarandale Lodge: targeted infection-control inspection was not rated; inspectors found strong precautions but gaps in social distancing at mealtimes.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 20 January 2021. It was carried out because of coronavirus outbreaks in care homes and focused on infection prevention and control.

Inspectors found that testing, personal protective equipment, cleaning and infection-control arrangements were in place. Relatives were supported to keep in touch through calls, garden visits and an indoor visiting pod. End-of-life visits were also supported with extra safety measures.

The service was inspected but not rated. The report does not give ratings for the usual five areas of care. Inspectors were somewhat assured about shielding and social distancing because there was not enough support for social distancing during mealtimes.

What inspectors praised
  • Testing

    The home was following government guidance on whole-home testing for people living there and staff.

    “The registered manager was following the government's guidance on whole home testing for people and staff.” from the report
  • Keeping families connected

    The home supported contact through video and telephone calls, garden visits and an indoor visiting pod.

    “People's well-being was supported by video and telephone calls to relatives.” from the report
  • Infection-control practice

    Inspectors saw appropriate use of masks, gloves and aprons, along with good hygiene practices.

    “Appropriate infection prevention control practices were observed, such as the wearing of masks, gloves, aprons and also included good hygiene practices.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    Cleaning schedules were in place and inspectors found the environment visibly clean.

    “Cleaning schedules were in place and the environment was visibly clean.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Social distancing at mealtimes

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found that the home had not considered how to support people to keep apart during meals. They signposted the provider to resources to improve its approach.

    “Consideration had not been given to support people to social distance during mealtimes.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now support people to maintain social distancing during mealtimes?
  2. 02How are the two communal lounges being used to help people maintain social distancing?
  3. 03What whole-home testing arrangements are currently in place for people and staff?
  4. 04How can relatives visit, including for someone who is at the end of their life, and what safety measures are used?
  5. 05What has changed since the inspectors signposted you to resources about shielding and social distancing?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control practices only; the service was inspected but not rated and the other care areas were not covered. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 February 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2019

Aarandale Lodge was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care across all five areas.

This was an unannounced inspection on 5 August 2019. One inspector spoke with seven people, observed care, spoke with the manager and staff, and checked care files, staff records, medicines records and other documents.

Inspectors found people were safe and supported by enough suitably checked staff. Medicines were managed by trained staff, risks were assessed, infection controls were in place, and incidents were reviewed for learning.

People received personalised care from kind staff. Their choices, communication needs, activities, health needs and end of life wishes were considered. The home was rated Good in Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. This was the same overall rating as the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    People described staff as kind and said they were happy with their care. Inspectors observed staff supporting dignity, choice and independence.

    “Staff cared for people in an empathetic and kind manner.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans recorded people's backgrounds, interests, preferences and communication needs. These plans were reviewed regularly with people and, where appropriate, relatives and advocates.

    “Care plans were person centred and included information on people's background, hobbies and interests, likes and dislikes and preferences on how they wished to receive their care and support.” from the report
  • Safe medicines and staffing

    Staff who supported people with medicines were trained and competent. Inspectors found medicines records in good order and saw regular checks of medicines management.

    “Medication records we reviewed were in good order.” from the report
  • Good support with health

    The home worked with GPs, nurses and other health professionals. People were supported with nutrition, special diets, eyesight, hearing and dentures.

    “The registered manager worked closely with other agencies who provided support for people's on-going care needs.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to maintain family relationships and take part in activities such as chair yoga and visiting singers. Family members could attend activities at the home.

    “People were supported to maintain relationships with their families.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you meet my relative's specific communication needs, including any vision, hearing or other impairment?
  2. 02How often would my relative's care plan be reviewed, and how would I or other relatives be involved?
  3. 03How do you make sure medicines remain accurate and safely managed for each person?
  4. 04What activities would suit my relative's interests, and how would you support them to maintain family relationships?
  5. 05How would you support my relative if they needed end of life care?

This was an unannounced planned inspection that looked at the home, care and all five CQC questions; all five ratings remained Good from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 30 August 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Aarandale Lodge

3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Aarandale Lodge →

  2. August 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Aarandale Lodge →

  3. February 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

51 live-in carers within about an hour of Southend-on-Sea

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £960 to £1,200 a week. 44 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
“She was always cheerful and looking for ways to stimulate my mother. She became her "friend" and provided best care always.”
Julie G., about Lynette V.
See live-in carers near Southend-on-SeaProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.