Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at 5-6 Prior's Court Cottages: Bradbury House

Goodpublished 15 April 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, but agency staffing and gathering people's views needed attention.

This was a comprehensive, announced inspection on 12 July 2018. The inspector spoke with managers and staff, examined five care plans and other records, observed care, spoke briefly with one person and gathered views from relatives and professionals.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found detailed care plans, appropriate risk management, safe medicines practice, trained staff and care adapted to people's communication and support needs.

There were some ongoing challenges. Recruitment difficulties meant the home used agency staff, which affected continuity and consistency. The home was also still developing better ways to gather people's views and improve some day-to-day family communication. The overall Good rating continued from the previous inspection in February 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised support

    Care plans gave staff detailed information about each person's needs, communication and preferred support. Inspectors saw staff using this information to provide calm and individualised care.

    “ELPs contained sufficient detail to enable staff to support them in a person-centred way.” from the report
  • Safe risk management

    Risks such as seizures, behaviours and evacuation needs were assessed and reviewed. Staff used support plans and responded calmly to early signs of anxiety.

    “People's safety was supported because identified risks were assessed in detail and plans devised to address them.” from the report
  • Respectful communication

    Staff understood people's individual communication methods and gave them time to process information. People were supported to make daily choices about food, clothing and activities.

    “Staff were very familiar with people's individual methods of communication and we saw them using these to good effect throughout the inspection.” from the report
  • Training and support

    Staff received induction, regular training, supervision and appraisals. Competency checks were used to help make sure staff had the necessary skills.

    “Staff were provided with ongoing support through quarterly one-to-one supervisions and progress and development needs were discussed in annual appraisals.” from the report
  • Planned transitions

    Moves into and out of the home were carefully planned around each person's needs. Inspectors said this helped reduce stress and incidents.

    “These well-planned changes, had helped increase stability within the service and reduced the level of incidents significantly” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Agency staffing

    needs fixing

    Recruitment difficulties led to the use of agency staff. The report says this affected continuity and consistency, although familiar agency workers were used to reduce the impact.

    “Ongoing difficulties with recruitment led to use of a number of agency staff which had some impact on continuity and consistency of care.” from the report
  • Activities and family updates

    needs fixing

    Most relatives were positive, but one said staffing shortages or a lack of initiative sometimes limited outings. Another felt day-to-day updates were not as good as communication during incidents.

    “One relative felt that staff shortages or sometimes lack of initiative, prevented their family member from getting out and about as often as they would like.” from the report
  • People's feedback

    minor

    The home found it difficult to obtain people's views about their care. Planned meetings and other feedback methods had not yet started at the inspection.

    “Obtaining the views of people supported about their experience of their care had proved difficult, and further development was needed in this area.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many of the staff who would support my relative are permanent, and how do you make sure agency staff know their care and communication plans?
  2. 02How would you maintain my relative's activities and outings if there were staff shortages?
  3. 03How will you keep our family updated about everyday wellbeing, as well as during incidents or crises?
  4. 04What new methods are being introduced to find out people's views about their care, and when will these be in place?
  5. 05How are medicines recording errors reviewed and prevented from happening again?

This was a comprehensive inspection of all five question areas, and the overall Good rating continued from February 2016. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 September 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 5-6 Prior's Court Cottages: Bradbury House

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. September 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at 5-6 Prior's Court Cottages: Bradbury House →

  2. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2013

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 August 2013.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

42 live-in carers within about an hour of West Berkshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 36 can care for a couple. 14 years' experience on average.

“Titus has compassion, patience, a great sense of humour and a very professional attitude.”
Marie S., about Titus M.
“Barbara treated my mother-in-law with enormous love and compassion and provided an environment where she could feel safe and seen”
Annie G., about Barbara B.
See live-in carers near West BerkshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.